WHERE'S MY FREE WI-FI?
[SOURCE: Slate, AUTHOR: Tim Wu]
[Commentary] The basic idea of offering Internet access as a public service is 
sound. The problem is that cities haven't thought of the Internet as a form of 
public infrastructure that -- like subway lines, sewers, or roads -- must be 
paid for. Instead, cities have labored under the illusion that, somehow, 
everything could be built easily and for free by private parties. That illusion 
has run straight into the ancient economics of infrastructure and natural 
monopoly. The bottom line: City dwellers won't be able to get high-quality 
wireless Internet access for free. If they want it, collectively, they'll have 
to pay for it. By 2005, it became clear that major cities didn't really want to 
build out Wi-Fi networks as public works projects. Instead, places like 
Philadelphia and San Francisco announced "private/public" partnerships. That 
meant giving a private company the right to build a wireless network and try to 
make money off of it. Often, this simply meant giving a company like Earthlink 
the rights to install Wi-Fi devices on street lamps and charge citizens for 
access. The cities then washed their hands of the issue of success or failure. 
The result, as this summer has made clear, has been telecom's Bay of PigsĀ­a 
project the government wanted to happen but left to underqualified private 
parties to deliver. Firms like Earthlink promised too much, and the cities have 
stood by and watched as the firms trying to build Wi-Fi systems have twisted 
and died on the beachhead. The lesson here is an old one about the function of 
government. When it comes to communications, the United States relies on a 
privateer system: We depend on private companies to perform public callings. 
That works up to a point, but private industry will build only so much. Real 
public infrastructure costs real public money. We already know that, in the 
real world, if you're not willing to invest in infrastructure, you get what we 
have: crumbling airports, collapsing bridges, and broken levees. Why did we 
think that the wireless Internet would be any different?
http://www.slate.com/id/2174858/fr/rss/


---------------------------------------------------------------
             WWWhatsup NYC
http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
--------------------------------------------------------------- 

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.isoc-ny.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to