> AFAIK thats right. It's a design decision not to extend existing > classes, as that can break code that iterates over properties of > objects. But I'm not sure if this applies to String, too. Eg. extending > String with a trim() method seems to make more sense then $.trim()...
That's correct. That's something that will probably be with jQuery someday, as a plugin - but probably not included in core directly. If anyone wants to step up and build a suite of useful functions, you're welcome to it! --John _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
