Hi, Maybe you could think of adding things like $A, $H, $S, $L where you
could do something like:
$L(['aaa', 'bbb']).each(fn)... would be nice
Abdul
limodou wrote:
> On 9/8/06, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> AFAIK thats right. It's a design decision not to extend existing
>>> classes, as that can break code that iterates over properties of
>>> objects. But I'm not sure if this applies to String, too. Eg. extending
>>> String with a trim() method seems to make more sense then $.trim()...
>>>
>> That's correct. That's something that will probably be with jQuery
>> someday, as a plugin - but probably not included in core directly. If
>> anyone wants to step up and build a suite of useful functions, you're
>> welcome to it!
>>
>> --John
>>
>>
> Thanks I see. I'm newbie to jQuery, I have some interestring in adding
> some extension to jQuery. But for plugin, I understand a jQuery object
> will encapuslate one or more dom elements(I'm right?), and plugin will
> also process these objects. But for string, array, etc, maybe not the
> dom element, so how to understand:
>
> $(['aaa', 'bbb']) or $('aaa')
>
> So direct plugin maybe not suitable, but how about:
>
> $.list(['aaa', 'bbb']) or $.str('aaa')
>
> I borrow 'list' and 'str' from python(I'm a big python fan). If these
> could be a reasonable syntax format, I'll try to make such extension.
> But because I'm a newbie to jQuery, there are should be many problems
> in front of the way I think.
>
>
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
