You're probably right. I'm setting up a page that has some nice moo effects next to some jquery-interface counterparts. The jquery ones are acting a bit wonky in certain circumstances. If the active Jquery community can help me figure out the issues, and reproduce the moo effects, we could probably convert some more moo-ers to Jquery.
I'll have the page up in a few days. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Resig Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 6:04 PM To: jQuery Discussion. Subject: Re: [jQuery] mootools > Since moo doesn't depend on prototype now, the hope was that they > _might_ be able to co-exist, but I would recommend just use one or the > other. Ironically, they now conflict more than before. It's easier to integrate jQuery + Prototype than it is to integrate MooTools + jQuery (which I have no intention of doing or supporting). This is due to the fact that MooTools binds additional function to every element returned from $(), which is quite frustrating to work together with. --John _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/ _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
