On 9/9/06, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > just uploaded a set of extensions to the String object. Until now, there > is no way yet to generate documentation like it is done with jQuery, > therefore the presentation is not too interessting. > You can see the test suite running here: > http://joern.jquery.com/sandbox/stringTest.html (together with links for > uncompressed and compressed version). > All functions have inline documentation with examples. > > Does this make any sense at all? Would you consider those extensions usful? > And, the most interesting question: Would it be a good idea to depend > jQuery on this, eg. replacing $.trim and therefore making jQuery itself > smaller? > > -- Jörn > > P.S.: Coming next, Arrays :-) > I also made something like your.
http://code.google.com/p/jbasicext/ -- I like python! My Blog: http://www.donews.net/limodou UliPad Site: http://wiki.woodpecker.org.cn/moin/UliPad UliPad Maillist: http://groups.google.com/group/ulipad _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
