Hi,
I already started to implement this feature. For now the dragged
element is copied to a helper and only the helper is moved. The
draggable will have a new option to append this helper to the parent
element.
Paul Bakaus wrote:
Hi there,
this is because of Interface appending the draggable element to the
body, rather then to its parent. For example, scriptaculous appends the
draggable to it's parent, so it will stay in context.
I had the problem the other way around: When using scriptaculous, I had
to modify scriptaculous to append to body, because of this: My
draggable was in a overflow: auto container and I wanted to move it
out. However, trying to move a overflow: auto's child will give you
only scrollbars.
Perhaps we should implement a option to toggle between appending to
body/parent, like appendTo: 'body'
2006/9/10, Yehuda Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>:
Anyone have any idea about this. Resolving this issue is
honestly the difference between using Prototype and jQuery for a
particular project.
On 9/8/06, Yehuda Katz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Stefan or anyone who can answer this,
I'd like to use a sortable inside a container a la Google Maps.
Unfortunately, the current sortable code "lifts" items wrapper inside a
container out of the container (regardless of zIndex) so you can see
the entire item being dragged. Is there a way to have a draggable item
inside a container that stays inside the container when being dragged?
--
Yehuda Katz
Web Developer
(ph) 718.877.1325
--
Yehuda Katz
Web Developer
(ph) 718.877.1325
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Paul Bakaus
Web Developer
------------------------
Hildastr. 35
79102 Freiburg
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
|
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/