Ok.
So how is this relevant to spreading jQuery?
I hope I'm the only one who's confused. :s
Jake-21 wrote:
>
> chainable the ability to chain function calls, as in
> $('#'+parm.id).slideDown("slow",function(){$('#'+parm.id).overflow("auto")});
>
> or
> var numb = this.onclick.toString().match(/press\((.*)\)/)[1];
>
> it's the dots.
>
>
> On 9/27/06, Dan Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Na. I don't smoke.
>>
>> Do you mean articles that link to other articles, or chainables in terms
>> of
>> code, cause I'm not sure the latter is relevent.
>>
>> sunsean wrote:
>> >
>> > One word, "chainables." ~Sean
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > jQuery mailing list
>> > discuss@jquery.com
>> > http://jquery.com/discuss/
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Spread-jQuery-Request-tf2333970.html#a6522530
>> Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jQuery mailing list
>> discuss@jquery.com
>> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>>
>
>
> --
> ???? - ???? ???? ????
> ???????????????????????
> ???????????????????????
> ???????????????????????
> ???????????????????????
> ???????????????????????
> _______________________________________________
> jQuery mailing list
> discuss@jquery.com
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Spread-jQuery-Request-tf2333970.html#a6522753
Sent from the JQuery mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
