Looks like jquery and prototype both win and lose nearly the same amount of tests.
They also didn't factor in the initial loading size of the prototype library, or the time saved by writing jquery syntax. This is about as fair as a political debate. Will > hey all, anyone else seen this too? > > > http://ajaxian.com/archives/benchmark-prototype-and-jquery > > Claudio Cicali thinks benchmarks are boring and useless, so he decided > to conduct a series of micro-benchmarks of CSS selector tests with both > Prototype and jQuery. He decided to do this after he saw others observe: > > * Prototype (1.5+) has CSS selector syntax now > * "jQuery is horribly SLOW" > > > > http://ajaxian.com/archives/benchmark-prototype-and-jquery > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
