> Wouldn't it just be easier to pass back the this (instead of changing in > the jquery object itself)?
Unfortunately, with the way jQuery was structured originally, it worked best to have the stack work in this way. It would definitely be best if it didn't modify the original object - however, a change of that magnatude is going to have to wait until jQuery 2.0 (or a plugin for 1.x). I'll see if I can get something working in a plugin form. --John _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
