<code>, <div> & full javascript each have problems Everybody (well almost) likes the idea of putting scripting in <script> tags.
<script> tags don't have to be coded as type="text/javascript"m as we know from vb and other abominations. let's just use the informal type "text/x-jquery-json" that contains 1 js object or text/x-jquery-text" for an unquoted string of chars and others... WHAT do you think about this? On 10/31/06, Dave Methvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Then, style div.accordion_init to be hidden, and you get the same > >> effect without "misusing" the <code> tag. > > > > Poor people that have to use a text browser, a screenreader, > > or simply have switched of CSS... > > > ... > > Here's another solution that may be suitable for you: Do not put > > all options into the class, instead simply subclass the accordion class: > > > > <dl class="accordion accDefault"> ... </dl> > > > > <dl class="accordion accExtra"> ... </dl> > > I share Klaus' concern on this. His suggestion of using classes to > indirectly represent plugin parameters sounds like a good way to go. Text > inside <code>, <div>, or any other tag is supposed to be content for the > user to view. Text inside <script> or element attributes is meant for the > developer. > > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > [email protected] > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > -- Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב ʝǡǩȩ ᎫᎪᏦᎬ _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
