from the very early days of the <script> tag... if the browser doesn't
know how to do it, it must silently ignore it... does it still get
slipped into the dom? in every browser? DUNNO! It works in FF &
Safari.

On 10/31/06, Paul McLanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ
>
> That's a good suggestion too... though I'm a little more wary of that than
> keeping it in the class attribute because I can do more error checking and
> catching if I'm in complete control of the scripting, where some less
> experienced dev or even a designer could introduce JS errors if they were
> editing any JS.  I'm envisioning coma misplacement hell...  Whereas, if they
> type in the wrong config class name it might not work like they want, but it
> won't introduce an error.  But I think the script tag is perhaps more
> flexible and would probably be the choice for a more technical person.
>
> But perhaps I'm misunderstanding you.  Do you mean for there to just be a
> JSON string inside the script tag?  I've never used a script tag for
> anything other than to tell an interpreter to parse and run the script
> inside, be it javascript, php, VB or something like that.  If you give it a
> type of "text/x-jquery-json", would it be executed by default, or would it
> (in a cross browser way) be ignored by built in parsers, and left for me to
> do with what I will via some jQuery trickery?  I'm curious about this now.
> That could be very useful if it would be truly ignored and not risk throwing
> of JS errors in the browser. Has anyone used something like this?
>
> <runs off to test />
>
> On 10/31/06, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > <code>, <div> & full javascript each have problems
> >
> > Everybody (well almost) likes the idea of putting scripting in <script>
> tags.
> >
> > <script> tags don't have to be coded as type="text/javascript"m as we
> > know from vb and other abominations.
> >
> > let's just use the informal type "text/x-jquery-json" that contains 1 js
> object
> > or text/x-jquery-text" for an unquoted string of chars
> > and others...
> >
> > WHAT do you think about this?
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> jQuery mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
>
>


-- 
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ - יעקב   ʝǡǩȩ   ᎫᎪᏦᎬ
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Reply via email to