The other point about volunteer instructors, if the number of courses is scaled up a lot, is whether institutions are prepared to build this into workload models – i.e. make it part of people’s paid jobs, and accept other things not being done instead. Doing it in “spare” time is not sustainable if one has to do lots of it!
(I think somebody else hinted at this issue earlier, but I don’t want it to get lost, as IMHO it’s one of the more important matters) Maybe this links in to the conversations about centrally employing RSEs, by having teaching of SWC-like courses be part of their roles? From: April Wright via discuss <[email protected]> Sent: 03 October 2018 17:49 To: discuss <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [discuss] How can we scale up Carpentries training at universities? Hi Lex, Can you say more on this point?: ⁃ How to keep the quality of instruction, and instructor motivation, high, if workshops become organized like regular courses? If the concern is new instructors not being experienced: What about offering a "course" section and an "instructor" section? I'm teaching a Natural History Museum Studies course, in which undergraduates are paired with a museum graduate student mentor to do hands-on collections research, and some Data Carpentry stuff with the collected data. I have a separate section for the graduate students. The graduate section is taught as a seminar course, in which we cover skills like keeping undergraduates on task, navigating the student-mentor relationship, implicit bias, and working with diverse students. At the point where I get them, they already have taken a "How to TA course", but it's now clear to me that I need to cover some of that again. The problem here is that I'm faculty at a primarily undergrad institution, and my expected number of contact hours is high. Others types of appointments might not be so flexible. If the concern is "Ho hum, I need to teach swc-git again; I'll just wing it": The volunteerism about the Carpentries is simultaneously the best and worst thing about this community. The best because people who do this labor do it because they love it. The worst because we inherently select out people who have commitments that preclude travel or giving up chunks of the day and just make up their "real" work over nights/weekends. Could instructor boredom be solved by coming up with a rotation? Rotating instructors between types of courses is really great, since different people will approach the material differently. Maybe there could be a semester where the "expert" teaches the material, then a semester where a competent practitioner and/or someone in a different discipline teaches it. At the end of the year, they sit down and make improvements to the material. Basically, a system where the same person isn't going numb teaching the same thing over and over, and you're building in a regimen of iterative improvement via diverse instructors. Just a couple thoughts. --a --------- Assistant Professor, Southeastern Louisiana University Biology Department 403 Biology Building 2400 N. Oak St Hammond, LA. 70402 512.940.5761 https://paleantology.com/the-wright-lab/<http://wrightaprilm.github.io/pages/about_me.html> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 11:18 AM Hoyt, Peter <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Lex, Let me agree first that this is a difficult issue. The Carpentries lessons and the Carpentries organizations are all about open science, open access, and community. I very recently had a student take a Carpentries workshop, and then wanted to be awarded course credit. My personal feelings about that are irrelevant because Universities need tuition dollars and so they aren't going to give away credits for free. Our University also wants to create Carpentries lessons where college credit hours can be earned (and, by extension, tuition dollars pulled in). My opinion on mitigating the downsides is to only offer lessons fully or mostly online (flipped or otherwise). This is enabling for learners who might otherwise not be able to get to campus. It also costs less per credit hour. AND, our Carpentries group will continue to offer the workshops on campus for free. In this structure, if students just want the knowledge they can get it for free. If they need the credits they can get them for a reduced cost. If they desperately want to learn the material but can't come to a campus workshop this is the best alternative. As a bonus, the answers to almost all the challenges are online (which seems motivating to students when taking courses). The Carpentries community atmosphere combined with freedom to adjust lessons based on learner feedback (and using pre-course polling) are the best tools we have to keep students engaged. It would be the instructor's responsibility to keep the material updated and fresh. Even if offered in a traditional classroom, the pedagogy of active instructor participation is much better than death by powerpoint, and will help prevent unmotivated instructors (hopefully). my $0.02, Peter Hoyt Oklahoma State University On 10/03/2018 2:55 AM, Lex Nederbragt wrote: Hi community, At the University of Oslo (UiO), we have an ongoing process that will result in a Masterplan for IT at the university. I am part of the task force responsible for writing this plan, and have been tasked to contribute to a section on skills training. We have a large Carpentries effort at UiO, regularly teaching one-day workshops with one lesson of the Software Carpentry stack each (including make and testing/continuous integration), very popular two-day R (tidyverse), and occasionally Data or Library Carpentry lessons or full two-day workshops. Many at UiO are now seeing the need to offer this kind of skills training more widely and organized as formal course offerings, potentially with students earning credit. I am very happy with this development as it is a recognition of the skill gap that exists amongst researchers, and a testament to the success of The Carpentries and our local effort in filling it. However, I also worry that we may lose something in the process of scaling up offering these workshops. By making Carpentry workshops a core offering across departments, with students able to earn credit from them, my fear is that the spirit of the volunteer effort gets lost or may become reduced. Making our workshops into required courses may change (reduce) the motivation for learners and instructors. So here are my questions to you: ⁃ Have other universities made the same move, or are they planning this, and if so, how are they organizing this effort? ⁃ How to keep learners motivated if they feel they are required to take a Carpentries workshops? ⁃ How to keep the quality of instruction, and instructor motivation, high, if workshops become organized like regular courses? I’d appreciate any suggestions that will help us become succesful scaling up our Carpentries skills training! Regards, Lex Nederbragt The Carpentries<https://carpentries.topicbox.com/latest> / discuss / see discussions<https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss> + participants<https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/members> + delivery options<https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription> Permalink<https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/Tad9e416c2ec4742e-M0223a648d868c59f6cfeea05> ________________________________ Heriot-Watt University is The Times & The Sunday Times International University of the Year 2018 Founded in 1821, Heriot-Watt is a leader in ideas and solutions. With campuses and students across the entire globe we span the world, delivering innovation and educational excellence in business, engineering, design and the physical, social and life sciences. This email is generated from the Heriot-Watt University Group, which includes: 1. Heriot-Watt University, a Scottish charity registered under number SC000278 2. Edinburgh Business School a Charity Registered in Scotland, SC026900. Edinburgh Business School is a company limited by guarantee, registered in Scotland with registered number SC173556 and registered office at Heriot-Watt University Finance Office, Riccarton, Currie, Midlothian, EH14 4AS 3. Heriot- Watt Services Limited (Oriam), Scotland's national performance centre for sport. Heriot-Watt Services Limited is a private limited company registered is Scotland with registered number SC271030 and registered office at Research & Enterprise Services Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS. The contents (including any attachments) are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and then delete it (including any attachments) from your system. ------------------------------------------ The Carpentries: discuss Permalink: https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/Tad9e416c2ec4742e-M1f39cde2b163166912413882 Delivery options: https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription
