To add to Claudia comments, I did the same analysis as Bob Muenchen in
r4stats, but targeting epidemiology, which would be close (somehow) to
biostatistics. See https://www.denishaine.ca/blog/popepi-rmd/. As a +, I
also targeted very specific journals, like Statistics in Medicine and
Statistical Methods in Medical Research.

Cheers,

Denis

*_____________________________________________Denis *Haine
+1-514-572-7174


Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 13:59, Claudia Beleites <
[email protected]> a écrit :

> Hi Bianca and everyone,
>
>
> Am 07.03.19 um 14:03 schrieb Bianca Peterson:
>
> Good day everyone,
>
> Some of my colleagues are planning to develop a Biostatistics course to
> bridge the gap between undergraduate and postgraduate students. They are
> planning to develop their material on using SPSS, and I am trying to
> convince them to rather use R/RStudio. They are reluctant to switch,
> because (1) they have been using SPSS quite some time, (2) SPSS is "easier"
> than R, and
>
> - r4stats has a post on popularity for several data analysis  packages:
> http://r4stats.com/articles/popularity/
> There are some graphs there that are very much in favor of R over SPSS.
> - Of particular interest: Job offers asking for R vs. job offers asking
> for SPSS
> - a not-very-up-to-date trend for publications. However, according to
> that, SPSS had its peak in 2009 (with SPSS : R ratio somewhere around
> 10:1). I did a quick comparison for 2018 using the search terms as
> described in
> http://r4stats.com/articles/how-to-search-for-data-science-articles/ and
> the ratio is now about 3 : 2 (75000 SPSS vs. some 50000 for R)
>
> - Basically, I haven't had anything to do with SPSS, so I don't know how
> easy this is in SPSS. But the point that gets most researchers and students
> very interested in R is when I tell them about reproducible data analysis.
>   - knitr documents and not needing to copy and paste stuff over into Word
> & Co and tediously checking for typos.
>   - with ease  ("just") being sure that you can look up all details on
> your data analysis if necessary.
>   - the possibilty to re-run without any need to worry whether your re-did
> everything exactly as before.
>
>   The reply ususally is that this is something they wish they'd known
> before: these are points (i.e. the not-so-reproducible workflows) that
> cause a lot of stress in real world academia.
>
> (3) they don't seem to think that funding might become a problem in future.
>
>
> - I've been in a field where Matlab was (or still is?) the main data
> analysis package. I've heard that as well. And I've seen people switching
> to python or R in a rather abrupt fashion when that premise turned out to
> be wrong.
> - Even if their group doesn't run out of funding, the students are likely
> to work in places where such considerations mean that there won't be SPSS
> (nor Matlab)
>
>
>
> I came across the "Data Carpentry for Biologists" material in the discuss
> list http://datacarpentry.org/semester-biology/ and I'm looking for
> something similar specifically for Biostatistics/Biomedical statistics.
>
> Any resources or referrals will be greatly appreciated!
>
>
> I'd be happy to give a hand after mid of April :-)
> I don't know of any online resource I can particularly recommend, but
> depending on how similar your biomed stats are to my biomed stats I may be
> able contribute "explanation story lines" on some topics.
>
> Best,
>
> Claudia
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Bianca
>
> Bianca Peterson, Ph.D. Environmental Sciences (Genetics)
> Post-doctoral Research Fellow: Pharmaceutics
> Potchefstroom Campus
> North-West University
> South Africa
> 2531
> <https://twitter.com/BinxiePeterson?lang=en>  [image:
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/bianca-peterson-007b5b117/]
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/bianca-peterson-007b5b117/>   [image:
> https://github.com/BinxiePeterson] <https://github.com/BinxiePeterson>
>
>
> --
> Claudia Beleites Chemometric Consulting
> Södeler Weg 19
> 61200 Wölfersheim
> Germany
>
> phone:  +49 (15 23) 1 83 74 18
> e-mail: [email protected]
> USt-ID: DE305606151
>
>
> *The Carpentries <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/latest>* / discuss /
> see discussions <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss> +
> participants <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/members> + 
> delivery
> options <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription>
> Permalink
> <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T7aec92fdeda8ec4b-M7356ed3ddf9ceacfcd4ed027>
>

------------------------------------------
The Carpentries: discuss
Permalink: 
https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T7aec92fdeda8ec4b-M2d7c7cfa91c7eb10699116b8
Delivery options: https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription

Reply via email to