Hi Bianca,

I’m late to this, but can also recommend the material from my former colleague, 
Bernd Klaus, who used to work with Wolfgang Huber and teach (very 
well-received) training courses as part of his work with the Centre for 
Statistical Data Analysis at EMBL: 
https://www.huber.embl.de/users/klaus/teaching.html#statistical-methods-in-bioinformatics

So many great materials linked in the rest of this thread too - thanks everyone!

Toby

> On 11. Mar 2019, at 15:25, Bianca Peterson <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Thank you SO much for all the resources and support. They decided to switch 
> to R! I can't express my gratitude enough. This amazing community is the 
> reason why I am so passionate about The Carpentries!
> 
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, 16:13 Hugo Tavares, <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Dear Bianca,
> 
> I agree with Paul's comment that "biostatistics" is a very broad thing to aim 
> for. 
> 
> From several years of doing R training to biologists (postgraduates, PhDs, 
> postdocs), I would say that a really important skill that seems lacking is 
> getting good at manipulating data and doing exploratory data analysis - in 
> other words, learning to ask questions from data. 
> 
> This is the essence of the "Data Carpentry with R" workshop: 
> https://datacarpentry.org/R-ecology-lesson/ 
> <https://datacarpentry.org/R-ecology-lesson/>
> 
> Although it's called "ecology" lesson, it's really about learning principles 
> of "tidy" data structures, how to manipulate those data and visualise them in 
> a number of ways. I think getting people good at exploratory data analysis 
> is, by itself, very powerful, regardless of the field people later work on 
> (biostatistics or not).
> 
> In any case, this tour de force from Susan Holmes and Wolfgang Huber might be 
> helpful to choose the focus for such a course:
> https://www.huber.embl.de/msmb/ <https://www.huber.embl.de/msmb/>
> (but it also illustrates how broad the field is)
> 
> Regarding SPSS vs R, I would say that if the focus is biostatistics, the 
> existence of R/Bioconductor <https://bioconductor.org/> should suffice to 
> make a very strong argument for R. (plus learning a scripting language 
> encourages reproducibility skills as mentioned above, which I think SPSS does 
> not easily offer).
> 
> Hope this helps!
> hugo
> 
> The Carpentries <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/latest> / discuss / see 
> discussions <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss> + participants 
> <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/members> + delivery options 
> <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription>Permalink 
> <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T7aec92fdeda8ec4b-M7619734a9d5c1a35f8fb76d1>

------------------------------------------
The Carpentries: discuss
Permalink: 
https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T7aec92fdeda8ec4b-M966f36587ddb4366edb5e901
Delivery options: https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription

Reply via email to