Thanks Marianne, this is very useful, especially also in the light of your additional explanation around EDA. I'm going to add this via the Github issue if that's okay with you.
We may find in time that these categories (or whichever other categories we come up with) are very flawed and needs complete overhaul. I am also thinking that one should be able to find resources based on keywords similar to the way people can find resources in RE3Data based on country of origin, or discipline, or type of data. I'm sure it will get very complex as more people's voices are added to this conversation. Thanks Deb and Shoaib also for your inputs! Kind regards, Anelda On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 3:12 PM Marianne Corvellec < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Anelda, > > From the visual representation, I get that Visualisation only refers to a > means of communicating results (and not to a means of exploring data). It > definitely makes sens in a reproducibility context. > > In this category, I would add animated and interactive (web-based) > graphics, and even dashboards. > > Best, > Marianne > > On Wed, May 15, 2019, 2:52 PM Anelda van der Walt <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi community, >> >> Which categories would you suggest for a Reproducibility for Everyone >> website and resources? I've looked at existing reproducibility websites, >> courses, slides, data life cycles, research life cycles, open science >> resources, etc and came up with the suggestion below. Also see attached for >> visual representation. How can we improve on this? >> >> I'm working with the Reproducibility for Everyone group as part of a >> Mozilla Mini-grant to help with content management and organisation. The >> existing materials and resources are mostly related to either general >> contexts or the life sciences, but we want to open things up for other >> groups to join and contribute as well in future. >> >> Please help us by replying here (remember reply means you'll send the >> email to everyone - alternatively just email [email protected]) or >> comment on the Github issue - >> https://github.com/repro4everyone/resources/issues/1 >> >> Current suggestions: >> >> - Reproducibility Dictionary: >> - definitions >> - types of reproducibilty >> - related terminology >> - backround >> - philosophy >> - etc. >> - Reproducibility and Literature Reviews: >> - keeping track (reference managers) >> - annotation >> - sharing (sharing libraries) >> - Reproducibilty in Research Planning: >> - data management plans >> - pre-registration >> - project organisation >> - study design (including power/stats/etc) >> - Reproducibility and Sharing: >> - collaboration tools >> - licensing >> - funder & journal policies >> - publishing >> - sharing in-house developed resources (e.g. reagents, materials, >> software, other) >> - Experiments: >> - materials >> - protocols >> - lab notebooks >> - data collection & creation >> - metadata >> - Analysis & Computation: >> - statistics >> - scripts/code >> - version control >> - containers/environments >> - workflows >> - Visualisation >> - images >> - plots >> - Other Resources >> - presentations, workshops, websites, twitter handles, etc, etc. >> >> >> Your input is much appreciated! >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Anelda >> > *The Carpentries <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/latest>* / discuss / > see discussions <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss> + > participants <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/members> + > delivery > options <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription> > Permalink > <https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T2ec244110a5f6bc4-Mf86f40a09ac448e4f8e10658> > ------------------------------------------ The Carpentries: discuss Permalink: https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/T2ec244110a5f6bc4-M17d9d881b2a65b2b0dc49e79 Delivery options: https://carpentries.topicbox.com/groups/discuss/subscription
