"Matt Lewandowsky" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not advocating anything like what you're talking about. Right now, 
> Illumos needs to be a useful set of code. The quickest way to get there is 
> to ensure that you have at least one fully-functional platform, then bring 
> the other(s) back to parity.

Maybe you missunderstand me: I vote to avoid adding incorrect code as early as 
possible. Sparec related problems could be avoided _iff_ someone runs 
compilations on Sparc. If such a compilation unveils problems, they should be 
fixed ad soon as possible.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
       [email protected]                (uni)  
       [email protected] (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.illumos.org/m/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to