I agree. However, I think that getting it all buildable by something that
resembles a mere mortal who is starting on 134, at all, is paramount.
--Matt
--
Matt Lewandowsky
Big Geek
Greenviolet
[email protected] http://www.greenviolet.net
+1 415 578 5782 (US) +44 844 484 8254 (UK)
+86 755 33944325 (CN) +39 02 8715 7053 (IT)
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Joerg Schilling" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, 19 August, 2010 2:00
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [illumos-Discuss] SPARC
"Matt Lewandowsky" <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm not advocating anything like what you're talking about. Right now,
Illumos needs to be a useful set of code. The quickest way to get there
is
to ensure that you have at least one fully-functional platform, then
bring
the other(s) back to parity.
Maybe you missunderstand me: I vote to avoid adding incorrect code as
early as
possible. Sparec related problems could be avoided _iff_ someone runs
compilations on Sparc. If such a compilation unveils problems, they should
be
fixed ad soon as possible.
Jörg
--
EMail:[email protected] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353
Berlin
[email protected] (uni)
[email protected] (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.illumos.org/m/listinfo/discuss
