While we all discuss the various implications, and I think no one is wrong. I think ultimately, it depends on the purpose of the site and why it was created.
It could be just a simple, I just want a basic site to create a list of all the bad design I encounter and share with some people. I guess, with that basic premise, the site meets its goals. Now, if we are talking about visual design, improvement of overall architecture, etc...etc... definitely this site could do all that. But if the site meets its intended goal and the users are able to do what was envisioned, I think it is successful. My two cents. =) Regards, Melvin Jay Kumar On 10/16/07, Jarod Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I guess what I'm trying to say is if the design fails to show people > > where and how to use the product, that is a failure of the design.. if > > it does that and the product is still misused, that is a failure of > > the user. > Maybe it's a bit risk to think user's failure. It's nearly all come > from miss design. ;-). > > Cheers > -- Jarod > -- > IxD for better life style. > > http://jarodtang.blogspot.com > ________________________________________________________________ > Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! > To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe ................ http://gamma.ixda.org/unsubscribe > List Guidelines ............ http://gamma.ixda.org/guidelines > List Help .................. http://gamma.ixda.org/help > ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://gamma.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://gamma.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://gamma.ixda.org/help
