Agreed. Blanket statements are always wrong in certain cases :) In the end it depends what you're trying to prototype.. interaction? physical controls? physical objects? each will have different requirements and be better suited to different mediums.
On Nov 8, 2007 9:19 PM, pauric analoguisation <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matthew "a house made of candy shouldn't be used to test structural > stability under load. Just as a paper "prototype" shouldn't be used > to test an interactive product." > > I completely agree, but, I'll play the devil's advocate once more and > take that to the logical conclusion.. > > You can only properly test the final product, which is true, but not > entirely practical. > > There's a lot more to simply labeling a document a prototype, mockup , > spec, etc. There's annotations, coversheets, context & facilitation > (among many other things) that make a 'document'. > > So, statements... if I may be so pointed.. such as 'you cant make > prototypes from paper' are fairly, whats the word... > > thanks -p -- Matt Nish-Lapidus email/gtalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mattnl Home: http://www.nishlapidus.com ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
