Lisa, functionally there appears to be little difference between the two. I would disagree (personal opinion obviously!) about the ease of interaction. My take-away thought about Seeqpod is that most of the options are up front whereas Songza, for me, did a better job of defining the primary controls and hide the secondary nice to haves two layers down e.g.
Seeqpod: 32 immediately clickable controls on the main media page Songza: 7 (not including clicking on individual tracks. Also, stand to be corrected on those numbers) Remember, this is simply a music player Songza, to me, presents the primary message of the site up front and places secondary features such as social, playlist controls, etc in one level. There's arguments for both approaches, there are some flaws in the layout for songza such as scrolling. Seeqpod has a very broken flow in places. Nothing is ever perfect. But if Simplicity was ever a good design directive then... (o; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://gamma.ixda.org/discuss?post=22558 ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
