Andrei,

But isn't a serif font more readable at 10px/12px for blocks of text?

- Russ

Russell Wilson
Vice President of Product Design, NetQoS
http://www.dexodesign.com




On Jan 7, 2008 12:53 PM, Andrei Herasimchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> On Jan 7, 2008, at 8:43 AM, Benoît Meunier wrote:
>
> > For a better reading experience: *Arial or Verdana?*
>
> Arial is a bastardized version of Helvetica created because those in
> charge of the operating system didn't want to pay the license fee
> that would be required to put a proper font on their computer. (Both
> Apple and Microsoft are guilty of this.) My general preference for
> specifying the fonts for anything on a web site is generally:
> Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Sans Serif. In that order.
>
> Even as a bastardized version, Arial is still more readable and
> flexible for web projects that require heavy amounts of copy.
>
> There's a long history behind Tahoma and Verdana that I won't go
> into. You can Google that. But Tahoma was made to give Windows95 a
> new look and feel for the screen, back when screen resolutions and
> such were much lower than they are today. (At the time, Apple had
> Chicago and Espy, and Microsoft was looking to create their own
> aesthetic to compete.) Tahoma was basically designed for 9px, 10px,
> 11px and 12x sizes only. (Maybe 13px as well, I forget off the top of
> my head.) And by designed, I mean pixel for pixel design, not
> outlines and curves like PostScript or TrueType fonts. It was hinted
> specifically for screen pixels at those specific sizes.
>
> Verdana was created as a variation of Tahoma for web work because
> Microsoft seemed to want the same aesthetic but needed a font that
> could be read with dense body copy. The web was just booming at that
> time and Tahoma looks like junk when used as body copy because it was
> designed mostly to be labels for dialog boxes. It has a much too wide
> feel for long stretches of copy. As such, Verdana is certainly more
> readable as body copy, but again, it was designed for certain small
> screen sizes, 9px through 12px. Try using Verdana as a 20px headline
> and it looks like crap.
>
> So, if you all you care about is body copy set specifically at 10px
> or 11px, then Verdana is fine. The moment you want to use it for
> headlines and such, you're out of luck and will need to specify a
> different headline font. I tend to specify Helvetiva Neue and Arial
> so I don't have to worry about the issue. Arial is tolerable and with
> ClearType turned on with bigger screens, in my opinion it looks far
> better than Verdana ever will.
>
> > - If there any studies or facts about that?
>
> You don't use studies or "facts" to choose a typeface. That would be
> like using a study that claims red is always the best color to use
> for company backgrounds.
>
> --
> Andrei Herasimchuk
>
> Principal, Involution Studios
> innovating the digital world
>
> e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> c. +1 408 306 6422
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah*
> February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA
> Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
> To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
> List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
> List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
>



-- 
Russell Wilson
Vice President, Product Design
NetQoS
Personal Blog: http://www.dexodesign.com
________________________________________________________________
*Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah*
February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA
Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to