> Are you sure? It seems like a good definition to me
I've seen whiteboard notes that were more comprehensive. > That is what IxDA members seem to be confused about - how > many times have we heard someone say they think UCD mandates usability > testing, the use of personas, thinking that UCD doesn't care about > things like business goals or technology limitations, etc?. The definition of UCD should include discussion of how it's practiced. Same for ACD, and so on. The method of practice is the key distinction between these approaches. Without these differences, they're all just .... interchangeable words. -r- ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
