As some of you know, a small group of people recently got together via an
IxDA Basecamp acct to try to come up with definitions for common terms,
including UCD, ACD, and genius design.

This has proven more than a little frustrating, as expected. So far, we
haven't even all been able to agree that these terms need defining (and no,
I don't know why someone would join a definitions project without first
believing a definition needs to be created, but that's a different matter).

I very much believe the project is worth pursuing, for many reasons, but I
think I've come to realize I simply don't care enough about defining these
concepts to persevere the battle. There may be great potential benefits to
the design community in completing the project, but I have too many other
things to do right now that are far more important to me, and those must be
tended to first.

Regardless, I wanted to mention that the group is still going on and that
you can contact David Malouf about joining it. I encourage you to get
involved if you too believe there is value in defining these key terms that
get debated so frequently on this and other lists.

Thanks.

-- 
-Robert Hoekman, Jr.-
CEO / Principal Experience Designer
Miskeeto, LLC — www.miskeeto.com
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to