Would you consider the term defined as  

"A property in which the physical characteristics of an object or
environment {inform the user of} its function."

To sufficiently clarify the following ?

-An affordance exists relative to the action capabilities of a
particular actor.
-The existence of an affordance is independent of the actor%u2019s
ability to perceive it.
-An affordance does not change as the needs and goals of the actor
change.
     
Which is referenced from the paper of McGrenere & Ho (2000)

And I think the FOX car is great example of how design has a  need to
fully appreciate the term and understand its application, as users do
blame themselves. 



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=27380


________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to