Hey there, My team is being pushed to work out haptic solutions (heck we are motorola and we have an amazing collection of haptic IP on the ROKR for example) for a new product I'm working on.
After several months of iPhone use my own heuristic evaluation is that audio is much more helpful that haptic responses. I've used various LG products as comparison and of course the Moto products. I know that Samsung and Nokia are investing in Immersion's vibration technology. But again, since none of this aid in target acquisition, touch screen sensitivity, or help with blind actions, I'm not convinced of the total value of doing this tremendous amount of engineering work to make it effective. What do people think and what experiences do people have? -- dave -- David Malouf http://synapticburn.com/ http://ixda.org/ http://motorola.com/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
