The company I currently work for provides online services for
restaurants. One of our greatest accomplishments for this company as
a design team is a seating management program that is about to go
into several test restaurants. 

When we began the research for this product, we went into all the
restaurants here in the town of Durango to interview hosts and
hostesses. We did not really introduce ourselves as designers looking
to develop a better way to seat guests but more so as researchers for
a start-up company. We began by asking them about the work they do
and had them walk us through a typical workday. We then proceeded to
examine their actual behavior. We documented the different types of
mediums they used in taking reservations, handling walk-ins and
dealings with restaurant staff. It was in observing their behaviors
that allowed us to clearly see both the problems and solutions.

Once we compiled this information, we were able to build solid
personas, true-to-life scenarios, story boards, workflows and then
wireframes that we then could take back to the host and hostesses for
usability testing. From there, we did visual comp specs that we then
tested again before turning over to engineering. 

Ultimately, it is the quality of the research and experience of the
researcher that will determine the true value it can bring to the
design process. We were fortunate to have an outstanding individual
who truly understood how to properly perform research to give us such
powerful results. I apologize if I seem condescending, but if you are
not getting value out of your research, then you need to ask yourself
if you are doing it right. We also have employees here who are not
adept to doing research correctly and the results have been less than
useless.

Even with my experience doing this research, I do not consider myself
an expert in this field.

My only bit of advice (at this moment) is:

Do not go straight into telling people what you are doing and then
asking them what they think they would want you to do. Even by
telling them what you are doing, you begin influencing their
answers.Your interviewees will always want to impress you with their
intelligence and try to say what they think you want to hear. So
don't give them any clues.

Research their behaviors, maybe even secretly (I know, easier said
than done) They will give you more answers if they think they are not
being tested under the microscope.

Maybe save the hardcore "interviewing" as a means of usability
testing with some low fidelity mock ups. We just made color copies
and had people pretend they were computer screens.

Have the right people do the interviewing. Many of us think we can do
it right, but if others observed us, they may think differently.

As for myself, I look forward to continually learning from all of you
here - Thank you for your time!
Stefan



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=27702


________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to