My observations... 1) I was curious how they do audio playback, so I dug through the source. While the UI is all HTML (and so elegantly simple), the audio playback is, in fact, flash. Volume control would be a nice touch, perhaps in the page header?
2) A non-scrolling page header might be nice too. If i scroll down, I lose the title/author of the mixtape. 3) Ironic: the UI is very iPhone-like, but since it uses flash, it won't work on an iPhone. 4) Off-topic: Flash with audio playback likes to occasionally hang my browser (Firefox, fairly old Fedora Core Linux) -- my sincere thank you, Google, for implementing auto-saving drafts in Gmail. You guys are awesome. On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Matthew Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) While having the text huge and simple makes it easy to read, making > everything on the page clickable makes it extremely frustrating when > trying > to focus on the window without changing the song. > > 2) No volume control means I have to change the volume on the computer. I > hate that, but that's one of the drawbacks of not using Flash. > ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
