My gut reaction was "oh no, it's personalized favorites menu all over again". I like giving Microsoft a chance, and I like giving new technology a chance, but that was generally regarded as one of the worst user interaction mechanics in all of Office history, for the reasons that it ran (slightly) contrary to muscle memory.
I can't seem to phrase this properly right now, but it's like... What if the user wanted to do something that they usually don't do. These types of systems tuck away less-oft used functionality, making for a really frustrating user experience that one time. On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 10:12 AM, David Malouf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Technology Review (MIT's innovation rag) has an article on Adaptive > UIs for the web. > http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/20872/ > > What do people think about this? Does it scale? > from an IxD perspective? > > -- dave > > -- > David Malouf > http://synapticburn.com/ > http://ixda.org/ > http://motorola.com/ > ________________________________________________________________ > Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! > To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe > List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines > List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help > ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
