> If your email had not indicate there would be "navigation > in perspective" I don't think I would have clicked > on anything in the image. I almost didn't anyway. > There is no affordance and I thought it was just artwork.
No disrespect Brett but, to test my assumption I asked a colleague to go to the URL direct and the first thing they did was mouse over the image, the popup tooltips were instant and it was patently obvious to me that this was an active (navigation) area. That is not to say that the site has navigation and Flash-execution flaws but to suggest the central image has no perceived affordance or at least invites a click action doesn't seem fair, IMHO. John. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=30320 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
