On Jun 25, 2008, at 6:33 AM, J. Ambrose Little wrote:

Having some framework and set of standard techniques to add some
predictability and reliability is not only far more attractive to those spending the money, but it is also helps guide designers to do the right
thing, especially less experienced ones.

Design is not about having a set of standard techniques that you follow blindly. Similarly, playing music is not about just hitting notes on whatever instrument you play. If you want predictability or reliability being a designer, then the only way you'll ever get that is through practice and more practice. But following a process to get reliability in design is like creating a player piano and then listening to its music. At first, it's moderately interesting to hear The Entertainer on it, but after a short while, it's both monotonous and lacks any human touch.

You want a framework? Go take a design class. Simple as that as far as I'm concerned.

As for the people who pay the checks? All they care about is getting a great product. If you design great stuff they don't care how you did it. Guaranteed.

--
Andrei Herasimchuk

Principal, Involution Studios
innovating the digital world

e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
c. +1 408 306 6422

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to