Andrei, what makes you think that 21 year old is likely to be capable of 
developing a better solution if they a.) don't know the business, and b.) don't 
know it's customers?

This isn't about UCD per se, this is about the common sense view that 
understanding business and user requirements are essential to the development 
of a good solution - this takes research.

You're also missing the fact that what is the "better" product depends on your 
definition of "better". If a stack of research dictates that solution a.) meets 
business and customer needs better than solution b.) then solution a.) is 
"better" surely? The 21 year old would be very lucky to discover that 
solution....

The simple fact is that whether you practice UCD or whatever else, the arrogant 
attitude that any good designer can simply deliver their solutions from on high 
to illiterate customers is way past it's sell by date. I think some of the 
designers criticising UCD agree that research is beneficial, but just don't 
agree with UCD in particular. That's fine with me. It's the "research is for 
cr*p designers" attitude that I object to.






----- Original Message ----
From: Andrei Herasimchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: IXDA list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, 26 June, 2008 5:00:38 AM
Subject: Re: [IxDA Discuss] Is UCD Really Broken?


On Jun 25, 2008, at 6:54 PM, J. Ambrose Little wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Andrei Herasimchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > wrote:
> "As for the people who pay the checks? All they care about is  
> getting a great product. If you design great stuff they don't care  
> how you did it. Guaranteed."
>
> Andrei, I caution you against making broad generalizations like this.

If I sat down with a few business executives and showed them two  
versions of their product, as well as showed them substantial proof  
that one of the products, which had been tested over a three to six  
month period, returned significantly higher customer satisfaction,  
fewer rates of return, higher sales throughput, but that the product  
was designed by a 21 year old in college who did it in his dorm room  
and knew nothing about UCD, and the other product was designed by  
their in-house design team following company approved UCD methodology,  
those executives wouldn't say, "We'll use the product designed by our  
in-house folks since they obviously followed the correct procedure."

Those business executives would take the better product designed by  
the 21 year old who did it solo without using any methodology at  
all... then they'd promptly fire their entire design team.

If that's a broad generalization, then consider me guilty as charged.

-- 
Andrei Herasimchuk

Principal, Involution Studios
innovating the digital world

e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
c. +1 408 306 6422

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help



      __________________________________________________________
Not happy with your email address?.
Get the one you really want - millions of new email addresses available now at 
Yahoo! http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/ymail/new.html
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to