I'm currently in the process of usability testing a build. The build consists of a lot of functionality but some of those parts are not connected to the main navigation. People can still access the functionality but not from the correct places.
I'm considering providing the user tasks to complete and filling in the missing flow pieces with paper mocks. Do you think it's going to be too disorientating going from a working build to a static mock or will people generally be able to make that leap of faith and understand they are still moving within the flow of the site? Alternatively, I could test the interaction design for the functioning pieces exclusively but I feel like there would be a missed opportunity to test the IA/nomenclature and a wholistic view of the overall concept of the site. Hope that made sense. Thanks for any feedback -- Adrian Chong www.adrianchong.com/blog ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
