In using Larry Constantine's view of ACD, I don't find any discernible difference of value between ACD and UCD. It is neither parallel or contained within one vs. the other.
It just seems like a specific way of reframing that which already existed as UCD for the previous 30 years. What was previous called "tasks" are now being called "activities". And the total tool kit of UCD that has been created over the last 30 years is just as used in part or in whole by the practitioner as before. Basically, why? -- dave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Posted from the new ixda.org http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=35466 ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
