Cool design! Looks less intimidating than a huge form, too. Feedback: * Agree with Adrian that finished questions should have some indicator of whether you answered them or not in the preview. And, they need to show what answer you gave, so that you can decide to go back and change it if needed. * The "I..." and the actual question aren't grouped very well (only via color / font). Why not have the question scroll up and land directly to the right of the "I..."? Seems like it would be possible. OR, simply place the "I..." at the front of every question, instead of separating it out like that.
Happy Thanksgiving, Loren ----- http://acleandesign.com On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Robert Hoekman Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > * I initially thought green-is-good/red-is-bad... I expect that will bias > > some folk from the actual accurate/inaccurate scale. > > > Good point. I was thinking, "Red = negative as in disagree, Green = > positive > as in agree". Trying to make use of that existing mental model. Perhaps > there are other ways. > > > > * Why does "neutral" have a smaller clickable areas? Again - bias folk > away > > from picking it. > > > In reality, the buttons will probably be all the same size, but yeah, > thanks > for pointing that out. > > > > * Would be nice to have an indication of how you answered questions in > the > > preview area. Would help when scanning for questions you didn't answer. > > Would help verify that you actually did hit the button you thought you > did > > on the last question. I imagine that once folk are into the flow of the > task > > they'll just focus on the question text - so may miss button feedback > that > > would cue them they miss-clicked. > > > > In my storyboard for the design, I show that after you click your response, > the other buttons turn gray and there's a 1-second delay before the > auto-advance kicks in. Haven't decided yet if I'm going to keep it that > way, > but it does help address the mis-click possibility, because at least you'd > be able to see what you clicked for a second before moving on. If you > mis-clicked, you can use the arrows to go back one question and change your > response. > > On another note, this design also gets you through an entire survey without > the possibility of seeing a single error message. As in, click wrong button > > go back > change it. Can't advance until you've answered the current > question. No validation needed. I'm very happy about that. I'm a big > advocate of eliminating errors. > > Regardless, I love coming up with new approaches to things, but > unconventional designs definitely bring up challenges. :) > > -r- > ________________________________________________________________ > Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! > To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe > List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines > List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help > ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
