For the record, I was being serious and not flippant. I meant no
disrespect to Jim or to his presentation of RED. I know how these
posts can sometimes be seen as charged and misinterpreted.
When I read Jim's description (which I have done several times), I
think of nearly every great designer that I have had the pleasure of
working with. Nothing in that description seems unnatural or new to
me. Though I do not exactly understand how it fits into the
methodology framing that preceded its explanation, Robert's (Reimann)
comments make sense to me.
Mark
On Jan 28, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Christian Crumlish wrote:
I'm thinking about promoting a new methodology called R.A.D.
(stands for Really Awesome Design).
(i kid, <jleft>, i kid!)
-x-
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 4:51 AM, mark schraad <[email protected]>
wrote:
That is exactly how I read it. RED = RGD = really good designer
--
Christian Crumlish
I'm writing a book so please forgive any lag
http://designingsocialinterfaces.com
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
