On Jan 28, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Jared Spool wrote:
I'm not sure that's true. In the studies we've done of folks employing Genius Design (still stickin' with the label!), it's almost always been solo designers.

-------------
Jared, I don't think we disagree. Many cooks in one kitchen - not good. I emphasized on "small TEAM" - i should have emphasized on "SMALL" as well. Lead designer is the one who eventually makes design decisions - he/she takes all expert inputs and synthesizes it all in a final design (or series of design prototypes). Some SW products domains are so complex that working solo is practically impossible... unless one specializes in some narrow domain (like enterprise network management, etc.) for a long time. Plus - building prototypes, creating visual designs typically involve other experts as well - so it ends up being a team anyway...

... and ...  I am not sure if one can equate R.E.D and Genius design...
IMHO - R.E.D is more about the mode of operation. RED team may apply a mixture of different principles be it UCD or Genius or ... BMCD (as in Biz-Management Centered Design - :) ) - as project challenges require ... the trick is in finding workable solution and balance between the needs of Users, Business Management and Geniuses .... :)



Yury Frolov
Design Director, Studio Asterisk*

GUI Strategy | User Experience | Brand

415 374 7478 voice
702 446 7840 fax

www.studioasterisk.com



On Jan 28, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Jared Spool wrote:



On Jan 28, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Yury Frolov|Studio Asterisk* wrote:

It seems like one aspect is missing in this discussion. I'd argue that typical RED project involves a small TEAM of experts who address various aspects of design challenge and may include a lead designer, researcher, usability specialist, technologist, visual designer etc. etc.

I'm not sure that's true. In the studies we've done of folks employing Genius Design (still stickin' with the label!), it's almost always been solo designers. If you rank them in terms of success criteria (we have dozens -- too much to go into here), the solo designers come out at the top. When we've looked at the Genius Design folks working in teams, we found the teams were small (2-3 people) and there almost always was a strong leader with a dominant personality.

From this very early data (we're still collecting and refining our results), this tells us that Genius Design succeeds best in instances where you have a very experienced, skilled individual making the design decisions.

Once the team starts to get multiple experts, they naturally will not agree on important decisions. At that point, they'll require new research to resolve conflicts and further inform the design decisions. This moves them into a different classification of decision style.

Jared

Jared M. Spool
User Interface Engineering
510 Turnpike St., Suite 102, North Andover, MA 01845
e: [email protected] p: +1 978 327 5561
http://uie.com  Blog: http://uie.com/brainsparks  Twitter: jmspool
UIE Web App Summit, 4/19-4/22: http://webappsummit.com

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to