If the 2 versus 4 pixels thing is on a crucial page like the Google search results or list of adsense ads, surely it's a MUST to test it and let the data speak? No? or would you redesign the ads, see revenue go down and not change your mind? Peter
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Dan Saffer <d...@odannyboy.com> wrote: > > On Mar 20, 2009, at 3:21 PM, Andrei Herasimchuk wrote: > > >> On Mar 20, 2009, at 3:07 PM, Dan Saffer wrote: >> >> Seems like reason enough for me. >>> >> >> So you think that testing 41 shades of blue or arguing about borders being >> 2 to 4 pixels to the point of being asked to prove 2 is better than 4 is a >> good thing? That all design decisions should be driven by Google's >> insistence on data driven design by committee? >> > > I think we're in violent agreement. I assuredly do NOT think is this a good > thing. > > (Which is not to say you can't do some interesting stuff with data and > design and testing.) > > Dan > > > > ________________________________________________________________ > Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! > To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org > Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe > List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines > List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help > -- me: http://petervandijck.com blog: http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/ global UX consulting: http://290s.com free travel guides: http://poorbuthappy.com Belgium: (+32) 03/325 88 70 Skype id: peterkevandijck ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... disc...@ixda.org Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
