Jarod, I don't like it. I find it to be ..
1) reminiscent of MS
2) too brash and distracting

More importantly it has in no way shape or form improved my
relationship with Google (or diminished it).

I think people have missed my point.
I think design is not for or against data, but design should always
be for imbuing human expressionism beyond the measurable. A designer
of worth, merit, etc. should always be encouraged to express
themselves in any way that does not break Raskin's 1st law of
interaction design (don't fuck w/ the content, purpose or utility of
what you are designing [paraphrasing]). 

When I look at a site like google, I see a souless design. Now, I use
google over Yahoo & Adobe for most things but that has nothing to do
with aesthetics. But Google would never take a risk like adding a
"Liam" (mail spelled backwards) character to their software. They
would never use the iconographic vivid imagery of a Buzzword
interface (Adobe). Because of this, these applications at least
attempt to have soul--connectedness to human expression to the world
around them.

I think people need to stop lauding Google as a design success story.
I think it hurts us b/c it is clear that it is an engineering success
story. Does that mean that engineering is better than design. I think
looking at Apple, answers that question. It doesn't. There are SOOOO
many ingredients that go into success and we would be fooling
ourselve as designers or engineers to think that any one of us
controls all of them.

BTW, the one place funny enough that Google DOES allow for a taste of
humanity is on their most precious search home page (Google.com).
Their use of holiday and historic event treatments is beautiful!!! 

However, I can count on 1 hand how many times I go to Google.com
(home page) any more. Its in the chrome of my browser or in my
browser's home page, etc. 

Soul!!! Time to swing the pedullum back from the austere periods
towards the more expressionist. I think we can do that and still
maintain simplicity, clarity, usability, findability, and overall
effectiveness. In fact, I'd like to challenge us to do it!

-- dave



. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=40237


________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to