> > I find the idea that "experience design" is somehow not valid because "you > can't design experiences" to be a red herring at best, and a canard at > worst. Our community has no other accepted term to address the breadth that > experience design discovers, with the possible exception of "design," but > that word has been so abused and pejorated over the last, I don't know, at > least 50 years, that we can't hang our collective hat there
Interaction design, and aesthetic interaction (it's more looks like a mirror of user experience from interaction side) looks proper for now. Cheers, -- Jarod -- http://designforuse.blogspot.com/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [email protected] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
