Hi Matt,

The biggest pattern is location awareness.

Cheers,
-- Jarod
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Matt Parker
<[email protected]>wrote:

> I'm looking for objective data on user search behavior, particular
> with respect to city and town names.
>
> When presented with a set of potential search fields that would
> include typical location fields (street, city, state, zip), do users
> experience more success when the CITY field is completely wild (i.e.,
> searches the data intra-field, ignoring spaces or other punctuation),
> or when the field is restricted and anchored (i.e., the search term is
> assumed to be from the beginning of the field's data).
>
> Any leads or points in the right direction would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
> ________________________________________________________________
> Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
> To post to this list ....... [email protected]
> Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
> List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
> List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
>



-- 
http://designforuse.blogspot.com/
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to