As someone who recently took part in a LONG debate with Mr. Spool on
this forum, I'm a bit sheepish about weighing in here, but I kind of
feel compelled to react. In fact, that experience was actually
somewhat frustrating from my point of view as an active participant
in the debate - mainly because a forum (not just this one - any
forum) is a terrible tool for ongoing debates that involve multiple
parties. The format encourages a kind of "last-word" mentality that
can be irritating to experience from outside the discussion itself. 

However, at least in the particular case I'm referring to, several
people told me (outside the forum) that they found the debate to be
interesting, and that the back-and-forthing highlighted aspects of
the issue (eyetracking, in this case) which they hadn't considered.
Go figure.

So, I guess there are a lot of factors that will determine whether
someone is interested or not in a particular discussion - many of
them subjective to the reader.   

Now, I'm all in favor of the "don't post too much every day /
week" rule - as in: give other people a chance to add their opinion
to the mix. That's sensible and courteous. However, I think there is
*potential* value in a 20 post dialogue between 2 people - if those 2
people are actually progressing the debate instead of restating the
same thing over and over. And assuming they are not crowding out
other views.

In any case, given how easy it is to simply ignore or delete a thread
- I propose that we err on the side of tolerance and openness. The
quickest way to kill this forum (quicker even than a bunch of
constant-posting blowhards) will be to make everyone feel that the
frequency (and, by implication, the quality) of their posting is
being judged by all the experts out there as being worthy or not.

It's my personal opinion that our profession is playing dangerously
close to an unappealing and unproductive form of elitism these
days... I'd hate to see this board (or this organization) embrace
that direction in its policies regarding public debate.

Just my $.02.

NG


. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Posted from the new ixda.org
http://www.ixda.org/discuss?post=45693


________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to