Hiya Todd,

 

You are correct, but I wasn’t citing a problem with usability testing per se
– just its realistic implementation in less-than-ideal conditions.  Point
being, usability testing can be a godsend, given the right discipline and
structured approach (such as from a contracted agency’s perspective, or with
a well-funded internal team).  Usability testing occasionally fails due to
external factors beyond the practitioner’s control. 

 

In the example given, the practitioners in question were my in-house UCD
team, who, in a given week, would have 8 or 9 apps “thrown at them” for
quick studies, wireframes, mockups, reviews, etc, with less than three weeks
for full testing with no lead-in, intro or in-depth research time for
getting the tech right before starting.

 

Ø  Sounds like somebody picked the wrong UCD/consulting company to do the
work. If the team doing the research doesn't involve the design and dev team
then you have a problem. 

 

It’s easy to blame the practitioners in the example given, and we heaped our
share of blame on ourselves for not being able to do more, faster, to
alleviate the tremendous usability problems across our organization.

 

On the other hand, the point I tried to make was that an underfunded
corporate usability team, just as an underfunded contract UCD agency
project, has an uphill battle to “get UCD right” for any given project.  

 

The difference, of course, is that an agency can turn down a project that
won’t pay the bills. 

 

Bryan Minihan

 

________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help

Reply via email to