Design should go for "reach" in the enterprise, why limit ourselves exclusively to the "web/ digital design" space, or for that matter "creative/prototype/product room"?
UX/ID/IA all these disciplines should strive for "Enterprise" integration/status/control. For design to stay exclusively in the "digital space/design rooms", leaves the "C" level jobs for mainly Accountants and Lawyers, (which is the bulk of present "C" level corporate America's background). Our disciplines can aide organizations at all levels. Think about it, when you have a problem and need "new solutions" and "new ideas", who do you call, a bunch of accountants and lawyers? It's a good thing and time for Design to go for "C" level, and "CEO" level in all enterprises! Rich -- Joseph Rich Rogan President UX/UI Inc. http://www.jrrogan.com On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Peter Morville < [email protected]> wrote: > I've added a comment to the Forrester article, inviting enterprise > architects to share their definitions via the Explain IA contest... > > http://www.flickr.com/groups/explainia/ > > ...it would be great to build bridges between these different frameworks. > On a similar note, I'd love to see some entries that show the relationship > between information architecture and interaction design. Cheers! > > -- Joseph Rich Rogan President UX/UI Inc. http://www.jrrogan.com ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [email protected] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
