On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Tracy Reed <[email protected]> wrote: > Assuming that is correct we face another issue. Over half of the employees are > permanently remote telecommuters (which makes support much more difficult) for > whom the company has traditionally bought PC hardware and shipped it to them. > > I lean towards the idea of specifying what sorts of tasks the remote users be > capable of doing (connecting to our VPN, browing the web, doing email, scp > files, etc.), giving them a PC/support stipend, and letting them deal with > their own hardware and support as a consequence of being remote. This should > give them an incentive to be careful with their tools and spend resources > wisely.
I side with shipping machines from headquarters. This issue recently came up at work, and I think my side lost. Some of my concerns are ease of management with consistent systems. My more serious concerns are with security requirements, such as encrypted hard drives or home directories, no auto-login, screen lock, anti-virus, etc. If the machine is to be owned by the employee, I would have concerns about information ownership. Most employment contracts have a clause about content created on a work machine is owned by the company. I would be concerned if a non-hourly employee was creating things (even sales leads) on a personal computer at home. I'm not a lawyer, so my concerns might be completely invalid, but these are the things that come to mind when I have to advise on such decisions. -Anton _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
