On May 26, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Hal Miller wrote:

> Apologies if it appeared I was criticizing YOUR attitude.  

No worries. It's one of the vagaries of this text-only medium we all reside 
within. :-)

> Added functionality availability can be a good thing.  Forcing upon people 
> who don't need that particular function is not.  Forcing functionality that 
> one person likes upon others who may not like it is definitely not.  Default 
> should be "opt-in" for this, not "opt-out-without-instructions".  (Tom, you 
> still there?)

Now HERE I'm going to disagree with you. If that was the case, we'd all still 
have sites that had almost no functionality and were waiting desperately for 
you the user to find the secret hidden "on-switch" buried deeply in preferences 
(and there'd be a LOT of preferences, one for every new feature added over a 
web site's lifetime, which might span decades). To expect that as the normative 
behavior simply isn't realistic.

The sites are going to switch the normal site behavior to what the 
site-maintainer believes the majority of folks are going to prefer. In some 
cases, where it is cost-effective to support a previous behavior, or where 
there is significantly vocal dissent, the previous behavior may be maintained 
via a preferences option, but not always (sometimes, it's just not practical to 
continue to maintain and support multiple revisions of a user-interface... To 
take it to the ad-nauseam example, imagine if Facebook had made every 
incremental UI change an 'opt-in' preference, and were forced to support and 
maintain dozens of different versions of the UI!) 

> I don't spend time on websites with lots of junk on 'em, so haven't seen that 
> trend developing. 

I started to see it first in actual applications, not web sites, which perhaps 
led me to recognize it when it started showing up on web sites.

Cheers,
D



_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to