Brandon Allbery wrote:
>I, for one, *have* tried to understand --- and the best I can come up
>with is what they come up with.  Which makes this discussion a bit
>self-referential, not to mention making your "when someone tries to
>understand" sound just a touch out of place.  Would you mind greatly
>if I asked you to explain yourself a bit better, given that multiple
>people are *not* getting whatever point you're trying to make?

Well, ok. I apologize for letting my frustration show.

This all started when Derek Balling suggested a gear icon was a better
way to determine in which language a viewer wants to see a web page. I
responded that, IMO, an even better solution would be to have your
browser send a language preference variable as part of the HTTP dialog
and for the web site to honor that preference. I presume such a
variable might arrive as an environment variable at the web server,
similar to the way the user-agent string arrives today.

Benjamin then interpreted my idea to mean that a web site would have
to be prepared for any possible language selection. That was not my
meaning as I explained. A site only available in one language would
just ignore the preference variable. A site available in the requested
language would serve that version. A site with multiple languages
available but not the one requested would serve its default version.
If a site wanted to provide a gear or a flag or a word button for
those visitors whose browser wasn't yet capable of sending the new
preference variable, I don't care. (But I would think it proper to
suppress such a button if the preference variable was set.)

Steven then complained that, because I criticized the variations in
the appearance of the gear icon, I must have meant that a web site
should retain a language selection button using words. I really don't
see where that idea originated. While I personally don't care for
icons, the idea I'm presenting is neutral on that subject. It's just
a more efficient and transparent way to serve the desired page version
without a viewer having to do anything most of the time.
-- 
Dave Close, Compata, Irvine CA      "If I seem unduly clear to you,
[email protected], +1 714 434 7359    you must have misunderstood
[email protected]           what I said." -- Alan Greenspan

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to