For networking gear, have you looked into RANCID?  It pulls
configrations from a fairly long list of devices, stuffs them into
CVS/SVN, and will send emails when it detects changes.

http://www.shrubbery.net/rancid/

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I should try that, we save copies of our F5 configs for backups, but
> sometimes I need to look through them to see what changed and when (now that
> I'm not the only one making changes on it), though its kind of a mess since
> its just a big directory of dated files.  Plus it would probably be more
> space efficient, though if I moved the backup directory to the NAS then
> space wouldn't be an issue.
>
> The nightly backup is of both a ucs and the scf....the scf into revision
> control I think would be helpful...being ascii and all.  While it would be a
> big harder with the gzip'd tar file with ucs extension.   For now I think
> I'm the only one that makes changes outside of the GUI to the F5, including
> some that don't get into the ucs.  They made it harder to add your own files
> to it...and there's no guarantee that when I upgrade they won't get ignored.
> That tripped me up the last time I upgraded the F5.  Plus someday we'll need
> to upgrade to new units.  Originally they said these would be the end of the
> line....though its probably more because when people's applications
> fail...they always blame the F5 for marking them down, or causing them to go
> down, etc.
>
> Like start of class rush slammed the student information system hard....I
> saw that the service was taking longer and longer to return to service
> checks, so I bumped out the timeout in the health monitor (to that
> recommended in the latest F5/peoplesoft guide).  12 hours later they made
> some change, and suddenly students are seeing other people's data.  And,
> they blamed the F5.  Wanted to know if it was caching or something.  No, we
> don't have that enabled anywhere. Kept insisting that we must be caching
> somewhere to cause this problem.  Didn't even know we had the feature.  In
> the aftermath, they want all the F5/peoplesoft recommendations implemented.
> Which includes caching, compression and use of oneconnect.  Well, we don't
> have a compression license...the free 5Mbps isn't going to cut it.  But, the
> features they claimed was breaking they're application are ones they want
> turned on now.  Though later it was revealed that the DBAs don't know how
> the web stuff works at all....but they'll play with its settings when they
> think they need playing with.  And, turns out there was a peoplesoft bug
> that was causing the session overlaps.  Even though the unit isn't EoSL, it
> is EOL...which apparently means we can't buy licenses to add functionality
> to it anymore.  They want more SSL TPS, since using 2048bit keys cuts our
> 5000 TPS license to a 1000 TPS license.
> ________________________________
>
> In a previous job, I had an epiphany that the most critical database that
> the company used was actually not that big.  At close of business each day,
> I did a full text dump of that database and auto-committed it into svn.
> This gave us a history of the database more or less in perpetuity, with a
> daily granularity.
>
> The idea was to protect against a situation where some bad data or
> corruption crept into the database but didn't get discovered for many moons.
> (Given the state of the application that was feeding data in, this was not
> inconceivable)  This would give us a way to go back and untangle things.
>
> --
> Christopher Manly
> Coordinator, Library Systems
> Cornell University Library Information Technologies
> [email protected]
> 607-255-3344
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>  http://lopsa.org/
>



-- 
Jesse Becker
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to