On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Yves Dorfsman <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2013-02-25 11:20, Evan Pettrey wrote:
>
>>         So this web client is written in what ...  Java?   ;-)   And
>> that's
>>         supposed to be better than .Net / Mono somehow?   ;-)
>>
>>
>>     Java runs on more platforms than .net.
>>
>> Isn't that akin to saying "we do it that way because that's the way its
>> always
>> been done!"
>>
>
> No! If you do care about which platform people can connect from, then
> platform availability should be a consideration, regardless of how you used
> to do it. I honestly don't understand where you are coming from here.


You made the point that Java is used on more systems, thereby inferring
that it was superior to .Net, without further qualifying your argument.

>
>
>  A web client would be a step forward for VMware management there is no
>> doubt
>> about that but I don't see why Java being used more frequently makes
>> something
>> a superior product.
>>
>
> Because people using non-Windows platform could use it. So you go from one
> to 3 or 4 platforms. I agree though that a pure browser interface is even
> better (more platforms yet!).
>
> I think I may be a bit miseducated here. Isn't .Net just a platform for
development that can be used for web development? Is there anything on
non-Windows systems that prevents them from rendering a website developed
using .Net?

I wasn't aware that there was and if there is, that would be the reason I
didn't understand you claiming Java's superiority based solely on the fact
that it is used on more systems.


>
>
>> Does that mean Flash > HTML 5?
>>
>
> The other way around as far as I am concerned. Newer version of Android do
> not support flash, I believe iphone no longer do flash either, heck, and
> Adobe said the last version of Flash they have release for Linux is the
> last one ever (although, they had said that before).


I agree. This goes back to you stating Java is used on more systems without
taking the time to qualify it.  I was simply stating that just because
Flash sites are more common than HTML 5 sites doesn't make it superior.

I think we agree on this one :)


>
>
> --
> Yves.
> http://www.SollerS.ca/
>                                  Unix/Linux and Python specialist in
> Calgary.
>
> http://blog.zioup.org/
> ______________________________**_________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss<https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss>
> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
> http://lopsa.org/
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to