On Jul 29, 2014, at 7:01 PM, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: >> And if they did that to MY network, I'd null-route them completely for >> abuse. Stick THAT in their pipe and smoke it. > > but if you are claiming that all that matters is which direction the most > bits are flying, what's your justification?
If they're generating useless traffic just to balance a TX/RX ratio -- to their own benefit -- then that's fraudulent abuse. > At that point it's your client's machines that are generating the most > traffic. So it's essentially similar in implementation to a DDoS. Their servers direct the client to flood the network with useless traffic. In the null-route they go, and my customers are given a stern warning about the perils of downloading malware. D
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.lopsa.org https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
