We've got a revenue generating website built in TCL and powered by
aolserver.  It's slated to be ported to .Net later this year but we're not
there yet.  Also have a few coldfusion sites but those are newer than the
TCL/aolserver code.

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Tom Perrine <tom.perr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The oldest protocol we're running anywhere is IPv4.
>
> (It had to be said! :-) )
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:35 PM, David Parter <dpar...@cs.wisc.edu> wrote:
> > I think there are (at least) two distinct scenarios for running old
> > software:
> >
> > 1) infrastructure: the difficulty of transitioning from old to new. This
> > includes the dollar cost of the new software (and hardware) and the huge
> > amount of staff time needed: both immediately obvious (the actual
> > transition/migration) and the not-so-obviouscosts and time necessary to
> > really understand and deal with all the dependencies, both technological
> and
> > business-process. It is very hard to know all the ways that people are
> using
> > the features (and oddities) of any major software infrastructure. And
> > getting people to change how they work is really hard, especially when
> they
> > don't see any advantage or benefit.
> >
> > 2) applications: some people don't like change, so they resist moving to
> new
> > versions or replacements for anything. Others have a legitimate need (or
> > legitimate perceived need) to be able to deal with documents and other
> data
> > from the old applications. It took us many many years to finally get rid
> of
> > really really old drawing programs that faculty were either using, or
> > thought that they might need to update the images that they use in their
> > teaching.
> >
> >   --david
> >
> >
> > On 03/23/15 15:10, Esther Schindler wrote:
> >
> >
> > I recently listened to an IT manager talk about how many Novell Netware
> > servers the organization still used. I could hear the pain in his voice.
> >
> > I’m planning to write a blog post about the old software that IT folks
> and
> > developers have to support. I’m thinking it might be entertaining… in a
> > schadenfreude way. And perhaps the “why” answers can give us all insight
> > into what makes organizations hold onto legacy applications, for good or
> > ill.
> >
> > I’m not looking for answers about custom applications or in-house
> software.
> > The reasons to hold onto old custom code are relatively well-known, and a
> > different discussion. But software you acquired from a vendor…?
> >
> > But… what’s the oldest software your shop still uses? Why is it still in
> > place?
> >
> > Send me a note privately if you like, but I'm not planning to quote
> anyone
> > by name. It does help to have a context (e.g. "says a sysadmin at a
> midwest
> > insurance company") but it’s the experience that matters, not the
> company or
> > source’s name.
> >
> > --Esther
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss@lists.lopsa.org
> > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
> >  http://lopsa.org/
> >
> >
> > --
> > David Parter
> > Director of Academic Computing Services
> > University of Wisconsin Computer Sciences Department
> > dpar...@cs.wisc.edu
> > 608-262-0608
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss@lists.lopsa.org
> > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
> >  http://lopsa.org/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@lists.lopsa.org
> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>  http://lopsa.org/
>



-- 
Shane Milburn
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to